|
Pella Roofing & Insulation
Spray Polyurethane Foam
(Closed Cell)
|
Vs
|
The competitors Soy / Biobased
Foam
(Open Cell)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exteriors Unlimited Spray Polyurethane
Foam (Closed Cell )
|
The competitors Biobased / Soybased
Foam (Open Cell)
|
K - Value, ASTM C117
- Conductivity (K) per inch
|
|
0.27 K/inch
|
|
| |
| K - Value - |
K - value is the rate at which heat flows through
a material. The K - value for insulation is normally
based on one-inch thickness, and is expressed in BTU/ft²/F/hr./inch.
Llower K - value equals better the insulation value
of the material
K - Value of regular fiberglass insulation is .22
- .30 this is virtually the same K - Value for Soy
based open cell foam. So when using Soy based open
cell foam you are not gaining any additional K - value
over fiberglass insulation. If we compare the K -
Value of Exteriors Unlimited's closed cell foam we
can see that our closed cell is twice as effective
as Soy based open cell foam.
|
|
| Back to Top |
|
|
Pella Roofing & Insulation
Spray Polyurethane Foam (Closed Cell )
|
The competitors Biobased / Soybased
Foam (Open Cell)
|
| R - Value, ASTM C518
|
7.0 R/inch
|
3.7 R/inch
|
|
| |
| R - Value - |
R - Value is a measure of the resistance to heat
flow. R - Value can be determined for a single material
at a specific thickness. As the thickness of the insulation
increases, the resistance to heat flow increases.
R - Value of insulation can be figured by taking thickness
of insulation divided by the K - Value (R - Value
= Foam thickness / K - Value)
R - Value for fiberglass insulation is around 4.
This number is actually higher than Soy based open
cell foam which has an R - Value of 3.7. So as a consumer
you will gain no advantage in R - Value with using
Soy based open cell foam over fiberglass insulation.
Now compare Exteriors Unlimited closed cell foam to
Soy based open cell foam our R - Value is almost double
that!
|
|
| Back to Top |
|
|
Pella Roofing & Insulation
Polyurethane Foam (Closed Cell )
|
The competitors Biobased / Soybased
Foam (Open Cell)
|
Foam Density, ASTM D1622
- Density (pound per cubic foot)
|
1.8 lbs/cubic ft
|
0.50 lbs/cubic ft
|
|
| |
| Foam Density - |
This is the amount the foam weighs per cubic foot.
You can see that Pella Roofing & Insulation's
closed cell foam weighs over a pound more per cubic
foot. This helps to add to stability to our closed
cell foam. This foam is not easily damaged or crushed
which for the consumer you will get more solid foam
that adds stability to your house and strength to
your walls.
|
|
| Back to Top
|
|
|
Pella Roofing & Insulation
Spray Polyurethane Foam (Closed Cell )
|
The competitors Biobased / Soybased
Foam (Open Cell)
|
| Water Permeability, ASTM - E335
|
1.4 perm/inch
|
4.5 perm/inch
|
|
| |
| Water Permeability - |
measured in units of perm-inches is an indication
of the ability a material to allow the passage of
water vapor through it. Lower the permeability, means
higher resistance to water vapor intrusion.
As you can see by our numbers Pella Roofing &
Insulation closed cell foam has almost 3 times the
water resistance as compared to Soy Based open cell
foam. This number is important because insulation
saturated with moisture can lose up to 50% of its
R-value. You can feel safe in knowing our closed cell
foam resists the water permeability and will retain
its R-value for life of your house.
|
|
| Back to Top |
|
|
Pella Roofing & Insulation
Polyurethane Foam (Closed Cell )
|
The competitors Biobased / Soybased
Foam (Open Cell)
|
Air Permeability ASTM - E283
- Test at 3.5" thickness
- Liters / second / meter²
|
0 - .001
|
.008
|
|
| |
| Air Permeability - |
Air permeability is the property of a building component
to let air pass through when air pressure on one side
is higher.
Again look at the numbers of Pella Roofing &
Insulation closed cell foam, compared to the Soy based
open cell foam. Our numbers range from 0 - .001 which
is virtually non-existant where Soy based open cell
foam is .008 or higher.
A better way for a consumer to test this is to take
a sample of Pella Roofing & Insulation closed
cell foam and soy based open cell foam and try to
blow through each sample with your mouth. When blowing
through the open cell foam air will pass through with
ease, when blowing through closed cell foam you will
strain to push the air through. You will then notice
the big difference between .001 (closed cell foam)
and .008 (open cell foam).
|
|
| Back to Top |
|
|
Pella Roofing & Insulation
Polyurethane Foam (Closed Cell )
|
The competitors Biobased / Soybased
Foam (Open Cell)
|
| Compressive Strength ASTM - D1621
|
22 psi
|
1.31 psi
|
|
| |
| Compressive Strength -
|
This is the measure of force that is needed to compress
the insulation per square inch. These numbers shows
the superiority of strength of Pella Roofing &
Insulation closed cell foam over the Soy based open
cell foam.
Think about it our product is not only the superior
insulation foam, but it will also add wall strength
to your home this is something Soy based open cell
foam cannot provide.
|
|
| Back to Top |
|
|
Pella Roofing & Insulation
Spray Polyurethane Foam (Closed Cell )
|
The competitors Biobased / Soybased
Foam (Open Cell)
|
Closed Cell content ASTM - D1940
- % of cell that are closed in foam
|
|
|
|
| Closed Cell content -
|
The closed cell content of foam is where you get
your foam strength, density and Insulation factors
from. More closed cell content equals better insulation
and structure strength.
Another way to think of Closed cell content is to
take an egg and put in the palm of your hand and squeeze
it. Try to crush the egg, you can't . Take that same
egg and poke holes in the end and try squeezing it
again. You will crush the egg. The egg that is crushed
is the open-cell content. An Open cell is a cell that
has an existence of an entrance and exit point inside
each cell.
The Egg with no holes is like just one of the million
cells found in a square inch of Exteriors Unlimited
closed cell foam. The egg with the holes in it is
like one of the million cells found in a square inch
Soy based open cell foam, It is easily crushed.
Finally this again shows that our foam is the structurally
superior insulation foam.
|
|